Tag Archives: National Theatre of Parramatta

Yoga Play

25 Oct

This is a piece of dramatic bliss.

It presents as sitcom spiced with satire, but appearances are deceiving. (Or should that be illusory?)

Multinational company Jojomon makes yoga clothes – and an extraordinary amount of money. But there’s a scandal, and now they have an authenticity problem. Profits are diving.

How can they fake authenticity?

Clearly, companies that make serious cash out of any spiritual tradition are perfect for a poke, as is anyone more interested in sculpting their body than nurturing their soul. The West’s appropriation of the Eastern practice of yoga is an exemplar of how capitalism can so impoverish the invaluable that it becomes obscenely valuable.

Playwright Dipika Guha creates terrific comic characters and director Mina Morita has a brilliant cast that pitch them perfectly. Joan the CEO is fully cognisant of the discord between corporate culture and new age platitudes, and Andrea Moor superbly portrays the tensions between patience, puzzlement and pressure. Thomas Larkin is magnificent as the company owner who refers to customers as family, and then treats them with the appropriate disdain. (And there’s some beautiful and unexpected doubling here). Nat Jobe and Jemwel Danao are a sensationally funny duo, playing employees who speak the new age language fluently, and almost believe it. Camila Ponte Alvarez as the LA yoga instructor who’s all gratitude, bliss and namaste – until you cross her – is absolutely hilarious.

It’s a wonderfully fun night of theatre. But I said it was dramatic bliss – because there’s more.

In addition to sitcom and social satire, there’s surprising depth. Gently and playfully, the piece explores two of the most crucial issues facing our society.

The first is sociological and centres on assumptions about identity. By creating characters of multiple ethnicities who are exploiting the practice of yoga, Guha puts cultural appropriation firmly on the table. We talk a lot about cultural appropriation these days, but at the heart of the concept are some rather odd assumptions. I’m not denying the concept has validity; I’m just suggesting we’d all gain from the sort of interrogation this very clever play provokes.

On a cultural level, what does my biological heritage entitle me to? What do I actually mean when I refer to my culture? Do I own it?

What, exactly, does culture include? (Culture is one of the most nebulous words in my language that I don’t own.) When is something a cultural tradition and when is it just a fashion? How fixed is culture? And is it possible to have tensions within a culture? If someone of, say, Indian biological heritage holds a particular value, does that value then automatically become Indian culture? Or are a certain number of Indians required to hold that value for it to pass muster? How many?

And what does my culture demand of me? If I reject elements of my culture, does that mean I’m a bad custodian? Or does it mean I’m a mature self-actualised individual?

And if elements of my culture enhance joy, why would I prevent others from sharing in it? (Unless, of course, the joy I’m talking about is defined solely as a financial gain that would be lessened if the market was saturated. And if that’s our default way of looking at cultural appropriation, it only goes to show how capitalist materialism has been appropriated by everyone.)

The second crucial issue the play addresses is psychological, and also centres on identity. Drawing on traditional Hindu beliefs (ones shared with many mystic traditions) the play asks several of its characters to consider the nature of the Self. In our globalised world, we’re perpetually bombarded by loud, outside voices. For safety’s sake, we’ve come to define ourselves quite narrowly. Or, perhaps more accurately, we’ve come to define ourselves quite emphatically. But every definition is predicated on exclusion. In asserting I am this, I’m asserting I’m not something else. What are we losing by our adherence to this safety strategy of the Self? What would happen if we didn’t define ourselves at all? If we let go of our insistence on borders, on divisions?

The play deals with all this in a gorgeously light way, and is as joyful as an invitation to the eternal cosmic dance.

Paul Gilchrist

Yoga Play by Dipika Guha

Presented by National Theatre of Parramatta & La Boite Theatre

At Riverside until 26 October

riversideparramatta.com.au

Image by Phil Erbacher

Karim

29 Jul

There aren’t enough plays entitled Karim in Australian theatre. (And, of course, there are far too many called Gavin or Ian or Kylie or Kevin.)

It’s intriguing that James Elazzi’s play is named after the one character: it feels a lot like an ensemble piece. Karim (played with an easy watchable stage presence by Youssef Sabet) doesn’t dominate the production in the way, say, Macbeth or Hamlet or even Miss Julie dominate theirs. In fact, Karim’s plot line is balanced with Beth’s (played with an engaging mix of energy and fragility by Alex Malone). Both are trying to break free from the dominance of their parents.

Beth’s mum (Jane Phegan) is an addict. Karim’s dad (Andrew Cutcliffe) just seems unreasonably determined his son sticks around. Both Phegan and Cutcliffe give performances of focussed intensity.

They all live in Tahmoor (97 kms down the highway from the CBD) and both families are doing it tough. The play begins with Karim and his father garbage picking, and we soon learn they make most of their cash working on market garden farms. They’re behind in their rent and when evicted, fall back on the generosity of neighbour Abdul (George Kanaan).

Abdul is also of Lebanese heritage. Unlike Karim – who was born here, as was his father, and his grandfather before him – Abdul fled the civil war. Before calamity engulfed his nation, he played the oud in the Lebanese Symphony Orchestra.  

Karim becomes fascinated with the man and his instrument. I would’ve like to know more about both these fascinations. Is Karim’s obsession with the instrument to be explained by his Lebanese heritage? And, as Abdul begins teaching him, is blood also sufficient to explain his unexpectedly mercurial proficiency? I’d also like to know why a 23 year old gay man wouldn’t avail himself of the $7.23 Opal ticket to the city, the gay capital of the Southern Hemisphere, instead of falling for a much, much older man. (Yes, reasons are offered, but I was left unconvinced – which I acknowledge is a standard of dramatic criticism that will leave many dissatisfied.)

By portraying what are commonly termed marginalised characters, a play like this seems to ask to be valued in terms of its authenticity. (Of course, you could people a play with such characters and be aiming for something entirely different.)

But this is a simple story, a gentle invitation to spend time with characters whose humanity urges us, softly but firmly, to consider the very nature of that experience.  

Paul Gilchrist

Karim by James Elazzi

At Riverside until Aug 3

riversideparramatta.com.au

Image by Philip Erbacher